Saturday, February 6, 2010

Waste Not, Want Not

Source : http://www.verus-co2.com/blog/?p=599
“Getting and spending, we lay waste our powers,” Wordsworth


We know waste does not simply disappear with the garbage truck. We also know that our heavily packaged, waste-laden convenience goods contribute much to the haul-away. Nonetheless, with the constant flow of trucks and all the pretty packaging it is easy to get caught up in the fantasy. For generations, we have wasted because we could. Dazzled by the marvels of the industrial revolution we have dumped poison freely into our water, drawn hazy lines between industrial by-products and food sources, and become hypnotized with “bigger-is-better.”
We have been meeting with organizations that take this waste and turn it into energy. One group spoke to us about taking old floor coverings and sending it to the cement companies who burn it for their processes. We have also been fortunate to come in contact with industrial level composting. Lastly, we have been looking at glass down cycling. However, this is dealing with the end product. We also should create less waste at the start.
If we want to foster a good quality of life and create good health outcomes, we will have to rethink the cycling of our resources. As the industrial revolution turns to the disease of too much industrial waste, we, who for generations have been freely entitled to take global resources without restraint, are having to change our habits in order to get healthy again.
Some of us grew up with an ethic of conservation, in part to save money, but perhaps more-so in consideration of the environment. In times of shortage, we all seek ways to quickly tighten our belts. Many of us experienced this in some form or another over the past year. Combine that with expanded knowledge of Global Warming and, what has long been a sub-culture of conservation, is now at the center of the mainstream.
New knowledge and methods, as well as solid information to make product choices that truly reflect a conservation ethic, are currently emerging. They are emerging quickly, however, as the drive and innovation is no longer coming just from people’s garages, but rather from some of the most powerful players in industry. Due to these changes in the business world, those who seek to be resource-conservative are able to engage in a whole new level of resource economy.
Whether it originates from industry or from consumer demand, markets can re-define clean and re-define convenience as we now look at previously unseen and unaccounted-for costs. With Global Warming upon us, despite the ups & downs of the economy, it should be cool to be frugal.

Basel Action Network — Part of the E-Waste Solution

Source : http://www.blueplanetgreenliving.com/2010/02/04/basel-action-network-%E2%80%94-part-of-the-e-waste-solution/ 


February 4, 2010 by Caryn Green  
Filed under Basel Convention, Blog, Certification, E-Stewards, E-Waste, Front Page, Pollution, Recycling, Slideshow, Toxins, UN
Open burning of plastic encased metal printer and motor parts. Open burning of plastics and other material is common in order to reduce the waste to metals. Guiyu, China. December 2001. ©2006 Basel Action Network (BAN)
Over the past two days, writer Caryn Green has explained what happens to many of the e-wastes people dispose of when we get new electronics, such as computers, flat screen televisions, and cell phones. She’s introduced us to the Basel Convention, which was written to prohibit the dumping of e-waste and other toxics from wealthier countries to poorer ones. Today, she introduces us to the Basel Action Network, an NGO that promotes the goals of the Basel Convention. — Julia Wasson, Publisher

Workers unloading sea-going container full of imported televisions and monitors at Alaba market in Lagos, Nigeria. Many of these that are not working, will be tossed into the dumps outside of the market.©2006 Basel Action Network (BAN)
The Basel Action Network (BAN), is “a global toxic-trade watchdog organization” that works to prevent the dumping of used electronics from wealthy nations to developing nations. With so many companies and charitable organizations offering to collect donations of used computers, flatscreen TVs, and cell phones, consumers are often lulled into the illusion that our used goods will be used for good. Instead, many of them end up dismantled, burned, and dumped in Ghana, China, Nigeria, and other developing nations.
Named for the Basel Convention — the UN-administered agreement that regulates hazardous waste shipment — BAN is the world’s foremost organization focused on confronting the environmental and economic ramifications of toxic trade. Working to prevent disproportionate and unsustainable dumping of the world’s toxic waste and pollution on the poorest nations, BAN actively promotes sustainable and just solutions to the consumption and waste crisis — banning waste trade, while advocating green, toxic-free design of consumer products.
Why is BAN necessary? Here’s what the BAN website has to say:
There is an ugly underbelly of economic globalisation that few wish to talk about. Under the guise of simply utilizing the “competitive advantage” of cheap labour markets in poorer areas of the world, a disproportionate burden of toxic waste, dangerous products and polluting technologies are currently being exported from rich industrialised countries to poorer developing countries. In effect, rather than being helped to leap-frog over dirty development cycles directly toward clean production methods, developing countries are instead being asked to perpetuate some of the world’s most toxic industries and products and are even asked to become the global dumping ground for much of the world’s toxic wastes.

Supporting the Basel Ban

Just some of the many labels found on computers and monitors which indicated to investigators where each load of computers originated. Guiyu, China. December 2001.
Working closely with the United Nations Environment Programme as a leading NGO participant, BAN is dedicated to promoting the Basel Ban Amendment Ratifications. The Basel Ban decision imposed a ban on all forms of hazardous waste exports from the 30 wealthiest, most industrialized countries — the membership of the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) — to all non-OECD countries, effective January 1, 1998.
Following this decision, opponents of the ban — the United States, Australia, Canada, South Korea, and others — sought to undermine it, arguing that it would not be legally binding unless it became part of the Basel Convention through amendment. Citing restraint of trade concerns, the opposing governments, joined by the United States Chamber of Commerce and the International Chamber of Commerce, have launched a lengthy and convoluted international legal fight apparently aimed at delaying compliance.
To learn more about the Basel Ban and Basel Action Network’s efforts to promote ratification, read “The Basel Ban: Triumph over Business as Usual” by Basel Action Network founder, Jim Puckett.

e-Steward Recyclers

Are old electronics piling up in your house or workplace? Look for an e-Steward recycler before you discard them. Photo: Caryn Green
Perhaps surprisingly, even the “take-back” programs provided by some of the world’s leading electronics manufacturers and retailers can’t be trusted, according to BAN. Taking your used electronics “back where you bought it” doesn’t guarantee that it won’t end up as e-waste that’s shipped offshore for dismantling and burning in a developing nation (or that your data won’t be stolen by a criminal half a world away).
To make sure that your electronic discards do not end up harming the planet and the poor, BAN urges consumers to use only licensed e-Steward™ recyclers. The e-Stewards have been vetted by BAN and have agreed not to export hazardous electronics despite the profits that can be made by avoiding the real costs of proper domestic recycling.
Ban administers a fully-accredited, 3rd-party-audited certification program to qualify e-Steward Recyclers to meet the world’s most stringent environmental and social justice criteria for the responsible disposal of electronics. These criteria stipulate that no toxic e-waste is dumped in landfills or incinerators, exported to developing countries, or sent to prison labor operations. It also protects against the unauthorized release of data in private computers.

BAN Initiatives

BAN has four major, ongoing initiatives:
  • Definitive Source of Information on Toxic Trade – BAN provides researchers, journalists, and the public with up-to-date information on the toxic waste trade. It serves as the “toxic trade media centre,” providing source materials and published articles. BAN has released groundbreaking research and conducted investigations in developing countries, documenting toxic trade abuses in photos and on film in conjunction with mass media outlets such as CBS 60 Minutes and PBS Frontline.
  • International Policy Advocacy – BAN works closely with the United Nations (UN), the Organization of Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and the UNEP Chemicals Program and Governing Council, regularly participating as NGO experts in policy deliberations and other internal meetings. BAN has also produced Model National Legislation on toxic waste trade for developing countries.
  • Research and Investigations – BAN produces on-the-ground videos and photographs of the toxic waste trade around the world. The organization conducts field investigations and documents their findings. Two documentary films, Exporting Harm and The Digital Dump: Exporting Reuse and Abuse to Africa are available with a donation to BAN.
  • Campaigns – Through coalitions with other NGOs around the world, BAN engages in effective campaigns to stop the dumping of toxic waste in developing nations.
E-Waste Stewardship Project to stop the importation of e-waste in developing nations and to encourage producer responsibility and green design.
Green Ship-breaking to ensure that all hazardous materials are either processed domestically or removed from all US vessels prior to export and scrapping on foreign shores.
Zero Mercury Campaign to adopt an internationally binding treaty to eliminate mercury pollution — its extraction, use, trade, and recycling — particularly in developing countries.
Basel Ban Ratification – Promoting dual action by the US and other nations to ratify both Ban and the treaty, and to block efforts to undermine the Basel Convention.

For More Information

The Basel Action Network
122 S. Jackson Street, Suite 320
Seattle, WA 98104
206/652-5555
www.ban.org
BAN is a 501(c) 3 charitable organization of the United States, based in Seattle, Washington.

India Will Generate 800,000 Ton Of Electronic Waste By 2012

Source : http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7017724083?India%20Will%20Generate%20800,000%20Ton%20Of%20Electronic%20Waste%20By%202012
 
Nilanjana Bhowmick - AHN India Correspondent
New Delhi, India (AHN) - India will generate 800,000 tons of e-waste, from electronics, by 2012. It generated 146,800 tons of e-waste during 2005.
A survey carried out by the Central Pollution Control Board (CPCB) said that the top ten cities that generated e-waste are Mumbai, Delhi, Bangalore, Kolkata Chennai, Ahmedabad, Hyderabad, Pune, Surat and Nagpur.
Meanwhile, the Ministry of Environment and Forests has notified the Hazardous Wastes (Management, Handling and Trans-boundary Movement) Rules, 2008 for proper management and handling of hazardous wastes that include e-waste.
The rules make it mandatory for all units handling e-waste to register with CPCB.
The hazardous wastes are also required to be sent or sold to a registered or authorized recycler or re-processor or re-user.
The Guidelines for Environmentally Sound Management of e-waste published by CPCB provide a detailed approach and methodology for environmentally sound management of e-waste.
"The procedures for setting up & management of e-waste facility shall include licenses from all appropriate governing authorities such as environmental clearance, recycler registration from Central Pollution Control Board under HW Rules, obtaining of consents under water act, Air act and authorization from the state pollution control board," the guidelines say.
E-waste is a term that is used to refer to waste generated from used electronic devices and house hold appliances like computers and television sets and so on. It contains over 1000 different substances many of which are toxic and potentially hazardous to the environment and human health if they are not handled in an environmentally sound manner.
Earlier, the ministry said in an official release that there are 36,165 hazardous waste generating industries in the country and they generate 6.2 MT hazardous waste ever year.

WATER POLLUTION

Source : http://www.houseandpropertyofabruzzo.com/2010/02/water-pollution.html
Life without water is not possible as it is main thing after food. Water is used for drinking and also for all the purposes. Now, the water pollution is one major thing affecting the health and also in cultivation. The industrial water mixed with the ordinary water contaminates the water for drink. Some of the chemical used in the water also health hazards as it should be avoided.
The industrial waste mixed with the water is not useful in cultivating the land as it spoils the nature of the soil. The chemicals in the contaminated water also lead in various diseases to the animals. Also, it should be noted that water is the major thing that has been used for several purposes. Steps must be taken to avoid the water pollution and also the environment.

We need to make more effort

Source : http://www.lgcplus.com/home/recyclingunited/we-need-to-make-more-effort/5010998.article

Becoming more resource-efficient matters to us all. We send more waste to landfill than any other European Union country, dumping nearly 20 million tonnes of municipal rubbish.
Germany landfills less than 500,000 tonnes, an extraordinary difference in scale.
We are increasingly aware of the environmental damage that landfill causes through the production of methane, yet we remain dependent on this form of waste disposal. Why aren’t we performing better?
For too long, landfill was simply the easy and the cheap option, and the government was slow to respond to the challenges of the 1999 Landfill Directive.
Consumers have seen too few benefits from better waste disposal and instead see new facilities as a threat. Penalising households who have already been clobbered with higher council tax bills is bound to fail.

Landfill

The current government still plans to send a quarter of our household waste to landfill in 10 years’ time.
If we want to green our economy and make the most efficient use of our resources, we need to recognise that the present rate of progress is too slow.
I believe that, with the exception of residual inert waste from which materials and energy cannot be recovered, we should eliminate landfill altogether.
This is a challenging goal, but we can meet it with fiscal and other policy instruments. That’s why I’ve already made the commitment that a future Conservative government will put a floor under the 2013 level of landfill tax at £72 per tonne until 2020.

Floor

That is for a floor under the tax, not a ceiling.
To drive up recycling rates we need to think more creatively about how to reward consumers for doing the right thing and enable them to share in the value of the materials and energy that we can unlock from waste.
There is also a need to address commercial and industrial waste, which local authorities do not have to recycle.
Yet a lot of this waste could be recycled or have energy recovered from it, so the challenge is to find new and effective forms of local partnership and facilitate the market in alternative forms of waste disposal.
Nick Herbert, Conservative, shadow environment, food and rural affairs secretary.